Episode 03: Summer Doldrums

This is the third part of a story. For the two earlier chapters, please see:


Vichu: 1981

It was the summer after Krishnan’s family moved away. It was memorable for the mind numbing boredom. With Krishnan leaving town, I had lost my closest friend. Actually scratch that. I’d lost my only friend. The cricket team had fallen apart after Ponnan and Alphonse went to study for various entrance tests.


Riverside temple


My afternoon routine was to while away the time at the riverside temple with only my solitude to talk to.  I’d sit at the root of the Peepal tree and dream up new projects for myself. There was one event at the end of the summer that was anything but boring. No, I’m getting ahead of myself. Wait. I’ll get to that story.

The temple was adjacent to a bridge that briefly got famous when it figured in a movie. The hero walked across the bridge in a song-sequence. The song turned out to be a major hit. Some of that fame rubbed off on the bridge.  After the interest generated by the movie died down, the bridge went back to being neglected by the crowds. That suited me fine. In the winter months, young boys used to walk up the bridge to dive into the river in full flow. But the flood levels stayed high enough for such adventures only for about two months. 

In the long summer days, I used to sit near the peepal tree, and would watch the leaves being swept up by the wind, swish around, and stay afloat for a long time. I used to wonder if the energy that keeps the leaves up could somehow be harnessed and stored. My physics knowledge wasn’t good enough to know what to even ask the knowledgeable folks to get the answer. 

One of those afternoons, I drew a picture of a vehicle that had a battery that would be charged by the dynamo attached to its wheel to generate enough power to propel itself indefinitely. My seniors kept telling me why that was impossible. They were quite emphatic without being able to explain their answers, but I never gave up the dreams to generate “free” electricity. 

A project that I did carry out successfully was a crude gramophone record player. A few months before the summer, Manohar, a boy in my class, told me that he had seen a street performer play a manually powered record player. Manohar said the man put a LP gramophone record on a spindle, rotated the record with a finger in one hand, and held a crudely built “sound box” with the other hand. The contraption generated respectable sound. I begged Karimbhai in the bicycle repair shop for a suitably sized part from a bicycle to act as the spindle, raided my grandfather’s LP record collection to borrow a few records of someone called GNB, and set out to build my own record player. I took the plastic cap of a talcum powder jar, put a needle through it, added a coil made up of tin foil to convey the reverberations to a thin paper covering the mouth of the plastic cap. Unlike the street performer in Manohar’s description, I was not able to spin the record and hold the ‘speaker’ in place at the same time. My hand jerked and scratched the first disk very badly. I persuaded the young boy next door - who was called Nami for whatever reason -  to spin the wheel, while I held the base and held the needle in place. This worked better, but we still managed to occasionally scratch the records. But this produced the sound. Over time, we perfected our respective roles with Nami operating the turntable at the right speed, and me holding the sound box without the needle scratching the record much. The player started playing rich music.  Nami was much younger and seemed pleased that our player made sounds he’d only heard from a radio until that point. His role was just that of an assistant. He didn’t understand when I explained my plans to build more robust players and sell them for Rs. 25 each. He had no enterprise and was easily satisfied. That made me miss Krishnan even more.

In any case, it was a doomed business venture. Amma found that I had ‘borrowed’ grandpa’s records without permission, gave me a disappointed look, and a sermon highlighting how valuable the records were, and confiscated our body of work.

When I wasn’t dreaming up projects, I used to go for long walks along the sandy river. Returning home was not enticing. Vani was very grown up, and busy with her work to pay any attention to me. Amma was as much of a drama queen as ever, and would worry aloud about my future. I hardly saw my father. The few occasions I did, he used to drop hints as to how I could be helping him with our family business.

The family business was making and selling seeval, the shavings of the betelnut. At the factory, the workers would feed betel nuts into a machine  and something resembling pencil shavings would come out. They would package this up and sell it for money. I was always at a loss to understand why anyone would pay money for this. Seeval didn’t merely look like pencil shavings, but also tasted like it. People used to wrap it in Betel leaves and eat. Revolting stuff. But people's interest in the foul stuff kept money flowing into the family coffers. Appa used to tell me that we were not rich, but were very comfortable, without explaining the difference.

Despite my impression that the business was lucrative, I had no interest in participating in it. I tried sitting in Appa’s store and the factory. The work was boring. It mostly involved verifying the counts of the seeval packs going out, and making sure that the bags of betel nut delivered were weighed properly. I could not imagine doing this for the whole of my adult life. The only saving grace was the pleasant smell of rose water-infused ‘panneer’ tobacco coming from Nagu mama, the clerk. It made me want to taste the tobacco. Nagu mama told me in a confidential whisper that that would stunt my growth. ‘Look at all the dwarfs. How do you think they stopped growing?’, he’d ask with a grave expression. That put an end to my tobacco craving. After a few years, I realized that it was a well-meaning subterfuge to discourage me from picking up his vice. But his threat had been so effective that I never again wanted to try tobacco again.

My aversion to the seeval business reminded Vani of her favorite character in a novel - a guy whose family was in the fish business. He broke away from the family and placed an advertisement in the newspaper, with something like, ‘A talented young man wants a job. Any job as long as fish is not involved. Crime is not a problem. Do you want someone to drive your car? Walk your dog? Assassinate your aunt? I’m your man!’. Or words to that effect. She never told me if he ended up finding a job that way. Vani used to be busy reading and writing all the time. It seemed unfair to me that Appa would ask me to learn his business and leave her alone. 

Vaxxy seeking Krusty

In any case, Vani’s story of the fish-hater gave me an unrelated idea. I’d been missing Krishnan. It occurred to me that a newspaper advertisement could help me find him.

All I knew was that Krishnan’s family had moved to Madras. If I placed an advertisement in the daily newspaper, he might respond, and we could resume our friendship, at least through postcards or phone. Phone calls were expensive those days. I could get away with using the phone from Appa’s desk when no one was around. But incoming calls were a different matter. I’d also have to be in the shop to receive the messages. If I start picking up calls, it would raise questions, as everyone knew I didn’t like doing that.

Kareembhai ran a bicycle repair/rental shop, and an adjacent grocery store. He had a phone. I thought I could persuade him to pass a message when someone phoned. The next time I was at his store, I memorized the number written on the dial.

I phoned the newspaper office to enquire about the rates. My voice was not very masculine yet. I didn’t want to expose my identity as a teenager, so I gave a woman’s name. They said they could run an advertisement in the Madras edition, I was shocked to hear that a small slot, with onerous word limits, would cost sixty rupees. That would almost wipe out my entire savings, but it had to be done. The lady gave me a reference number to use when I sent in the request.

After some trials, I decided to go with something like this:

Vaxxy is looking for Krusty, who lived in IOB Colony, Mandirapuram, went to NHSS, and likes comics. Call phone number *** or reply to mailbox ***.”

Vaxxy was the secret nickname that Krishnan had given me. I had called him Krusty in return. If you had asked me I couldn’t have explained the reason for the secret names. It seemed to be the right thing to do.

I wiped out my piggybank, sent the money through a money-order and sent the message through an inland letter. I got a letter, saying my advertisement would be printed the following Monday.

The lady I had spoken to said that I could collect the mailbox responses in person, which would involve traveling to Madras. That didn’t seem feasible. But I promptly arranged to be at Karimbhai’s shop Monday morning. I could not summon the nerve to tell him that I used his phone number for the advertisement. I thought I could hang around for a few hours to see how things went. I stayed there for two hours, ostensibly to try out the rental bicycles, but no call came. I went home.

When I reached his shop the next morning, Karimbhai was seething. He was complaining to a customer that he had received dozens of calls since the previous day, asking for someone called Vaxxy. I rehearsed multiple lines in my head to tactfully explain the calls. In the end, I could not summon the courage. So I just let the matter drop. It would remain one of those eternal mysteries as far as Karimbhai was concerned.

The case of the Disappearing Lawyer

Now, about the interesting incident at the end of the summer. My grandfather used to sit on the thinnai, the seating area in front of the house to catch a breeze in the sultry evenings. One of those evenings, he was reading the newspaper. I was seated a few feet away, trying to repair a kite. I heard noises of a few men running and some yelling. I immediately peeked outside with interest. My grandfather, being hard of hearing, didn’t hear any of the noise, and was immersed in the news. A man came sprinting, pushed my grandfather aside, and ran inside the house. As he entered the house, he bolted the front door inside, locking us out. 

Three men who were in hot pursuit, rushed behind him and tried to push the door open. One of them had a crowbar, and tried to break the door open. Thankfully, the house had been built a century ago, with a heavy door designed to keep dacoits out. The blows dented the surface of the door, but didn’t cause any significant damage. 

The men talked to each other in a strange language and ran around, perhaps looking for a way to get to the back of the house. It was a row of houses that shared walls. They would have to go some hundred meters or so before getting a way to get to the back alley. It all happened fast. 

Neelamegam, the gossipy neighbour next door, came up to enquire after a few minutes. He said he knew man who entered the house. ‘His name is Seshan, you know! He’s a criminal lawyer with dubious connections. Nasty business, his!’ Lowering his voice, he added that the lawyer had been involved in shady money sharking deals and he, Neelamegam, wasn't surprised at the developments. He left, shaking his head and looking delighted at having a story to tell everyone for the next week or two.

My mom was alone in the house at the time. Just as I started to wonder about her safety, she opened the front door, looking confused. I entered the house and walked the length of the house, looking for the man. My mom said she heard footsteps running to the backyard but didn’t see anyone when she emerged from the kitchen. I went to the backyard. The bathroom was closed and locked from inside. For some strange reason, I didn’t feel fear. I was the man of the house, and it was my job to investigate.  I gently knocked on the door, and called out, ‘Lawyer sir, those men are gone. You can come out now!’. 

There was no response. I heard some noises that sounded like the shingles being removed, some rustling, some sound of shingles cracking under weight, and then it was all quiet. 

The shady lawyer had escaped through the roof.

Appa got word of the event, rushed home, and was relieved to find everyone safe. He called the police. Two poorly equipped, bored looking policemen came home and hung around for a while. We gathered around Appa and told him what we understood. All women from the neighbourhood came out to check on us and get the news firsthand. My mom was busy talking to all of them. From what I heard, she looked at it philosophically. Her belief was that nothing happens without a purpose. 

Seshan would play a significant event in my life later.

Pic credit: Meta AI

Two Countries - Two Classrooms

Hypotenuse

Classroom 1: Mathematics


Teacher: We learnt about triangles in the last class. We’re going to learn about right angled triangles today. If one of the angles in the triangles is 90 degrees, the triangle gets some special properties. The side opposite the right angle is called the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse is always the longest side of the right angle triangle. There was a guy called Pythagoras. He came up with a formula. If you measure… 

Rahul: Why does the hypotenuse the longest? Why can’t it be the same size as the other sides?

Teacher: If all sides were the same, the triangle would become an isosceles one. We’ll learn about isosceles triangles in the next … 

Rahul: Why can’t all triangles be isosceles ones? 

Teacher: As you will see, right angle triangles have useful properties. 

Rahul: If I win the student union elections, I will conduct an X-rays of all properties, take some length from whatsitcalled - the hypotenuse. And give it to the shorter sides. (After talking in whispers to the boy next to him): Sam here tells me I should take away 55% from whatsitcalled. 

Teacher (amused): Won’t that make the hypotenuse smaller than the other sides? What about the difference in angles? 

Rahul: Then I will take some length or angle from those sides. It’s a continuous process. 

Teacher: This doesn’t make any sense. Can you listen now? I can answer your questions after the class. 

Rahul: I’m busy after class. I’m making a new story for the English class - The ant and the grasshopper. You know, the ant works hard all summer building up storage of food. The grasshopper sings all summer, doing no work. The winter comes and the ant … 

Teacher: ‘..tells the grasshopper, ‘you sang during the summer, go dance now?’ I know that story! 

Rahul: Not in my version. The lion king comes, takes the ant’s food store and redistributes it to the grasshopper. 

Teacher: That doesn’t sound fair. But this is not relevant for what we’re discussing here. Can you please stop distracting us? 

Rahul: I’m not going to stop. I’m a high school student, not some nachnewali like Aishwarya Rai. 

Teacher (raising her voice):  Rahul, I have a lesson to teach. Can you please not disrupt the class? 

Rahul: The class is a union of people. If you want to teach something, you come to me and say, ‘this is what I want to teach’. I say, ‘this is what I want to learn’. We discuss and come to an understanding. 

Teacher: That’s not how it works Rahul. 

Rahul walks out of the class, taking his friends with him, and blowing the teacher a flying kiss.


Classroom 2: Theater and Performing Arts


James Bond

The professor: As you know, in your culminating project, you have to make a short film. We’ll review your scripts before you start the rehearsals and filming. We will review the plans of Team A: Justin, Jagmeet and Chrystia. Justin, you go first. Do you have your script ready? What are you making?

Justin: Hello Prof! We’re making a short James Bond film.

Prof: How long is your film?

Justin: Fifteen minutes, give or take an hour.

Prof: Such a wide range! But I’m sure you have a good reason for the wide range. Can you explain your reasoning?

Justin: The length of the film is not important. Covid has made planning difficult. Students are starved for good entertainment. They won’t mind the extra time.

Prof: Covid was two years ago. Actually, the department is paying for it. They have a strict limit. Your budget is $3000. What is your estimate?

Justin: Actually, my teammate, Chrystia is in charge of production. She will give you the numbers.

Chrystia: Our estimate is $23,500.

Prof: That’s a significant overrun! What are your plans to cover the gap?

Chrystia: I plan to owe you the rest of the money.

Prof: That’s not a plan! And I doubt the university will accept any overruns. You don’t have time to replay - you’re expected to graduate in a few months. Provided you pass, of course. Ok, let’s leave that aside. Tell me the story.

Justin: My story happens during the cold war. A Canadian spy has gone rogue, and is threatening to blow up an airbase with a missile launched out of Russia. James Bond goes after him.

Jagmeet (interrupting): If he made a threat, I’m sure he had a good reason.

Prof: Can you please not interrupt Jagmeet? Justin, you were saying?

Justin: The spy is hiding in the soviet republic, plotting his mission. James Bond finds him and talks to him.

Prof: But Bond is licensed to kill. Can’t he do something … more impactful than just  talking?

Justin: No, he can’t. In the first scene, the prime minister talks to him and reiterates the importance of the rule of law and the international rules-based order. 

Jagmeet: And to put pressure on Russia, his friends in Canada drive around with bumper stickers, saying ‘No airbase, no transport!’

Chrystia: All those friends should be Ukranians. Actually, all the good guys in the films are Ukranians.

Jagmeet: And all the bad guys are grocery store bosses. 

Justin: That’s not what we talked about!

Jagmeet: We didn’t talk about this, but I never bought into the plot. Your story is terrible. Boo!

Prof: If you didn’t like the plot, why did you choose to join this team?

Jagmeet: I’m always for the hard-working students. They want me to hold this team accountable. 

Prof: But you’re all individually marked on this. Are you planning on doing anything?

Jagmeet: Yes, there was a genocide a few decades ago, in another part of the world. I’m raising awareness. 

Prof: I was asking what you’re doing in this short film project.

Jagmeet: Yes, I’m raising awareness. 

Prof (sighing): Let’s leave that aside. How does the story end?

Justin: That’s the best part. The scientist who designed the missile is the bad guy’s girlfriend. She has a crush on Bond. She offers to redirect the missile to an unpopulated area if Bond accepts her indecent proposal.

Prof: Oh, we’re pivoting to the romance theme! How interesting!

Justin: No, wait. Now comes the best part. Bond self identifies as a woman and declines her proposal.

The professor faints.

ஆனந்தக்கவிராயர் கவிதைகள் (Tamil Poems)


1. கடவுளும் மனிதனும்




கடவுள்:

செல்வத்துள் செல்வமாம் செவிச்செல்வம் சிறந்திடவே

செவியிரண்டும் நாவொன்றும் நான்தந்தேன் - சொல்லடக்கிச்

செவ்வினிய நன்பொருள் நிதம்கேட்கும் மாந்தர்க்குப்

பல்நலனும் பெருகும் பார்!

மனிதன்:

கலைமுதல்வா, கருத்தினை ஒப்புவேன், ஆயினும்

இ(ல்)லைஅடக்கம் இப்புவியில்; சமூக - வலையுலகில்

இருகண்ணால் படித்து விரல்பத்தால் பகிரும்

நிலைபிழன்ற மாந்தரைத் திருத்து!


2. சூரிய கிரகணம் 


 

ஞாயிறு ஒளிமழை வெள்ளம் தடுத்துத் திங்கள் கொண்டது பெருமிதம்! வான்மகள் அழகை வியந்தவர் அளித்த வைர வளையச் சீதனம்! மானுடர் மதியத் தூக்கம் கண்டு ஆதவன் அயரும் அற்புதம்! இறைவன் இலையெனும் நாத்திகர் மனத்தில் இனமிலா ஐயம் ஒருகணம். அண்டம், ஆதி, ஆதவன் எதிரே அணுவின் அளவே நம்மினம், பகலிலே ஓர் இரவினைக் கண்டு பணிவைக் கண்டது என்மனம்.


3. இலையுதிர் கால வண்ணங்கள்






மயங்கும் மாலையில் வியந்து நடந்தேன் 
மரங்களின்  நிறங்களில் சிலிர்த்து - நிலமகள்
பனிமழை நீராடப் பயணமாகிறாள் 
கனியும்தன்  ஆடைகள் உதிர்த்து!


4. மழையும் குடையும்!



மழைமிகுந்து, துயர்மிகுந்து நலிவுறும் காலத்தே 
மனங்கசிந் துதவார் பிறர்க்கு - ஆயினும் 
மடைவடிந்தது, புயல்கடந்து முடிந்தபின் ஆட்சிக்குக் 
குடைபிடிப்பர் புல்லர் இயைந்து.

5. பொன்னியின் செல்வன் 



குந்தவையும், நந்தினியும் வந்தியனும் எந்தம்
முந்தையப் பிறவியின்`சொந்தங்களோ - வந்தனர்
விந்தையாய்த் திரை மீதினில் மாந்தர்
சிந்தையை முற்றும் கவர்ந்து.

6.  சிலேடை - துகில் அரசிகள் 



துகிலினால் பொலிவுபெறும், துறவிகள் வழிமாற்றும்;

அடுக்களையின் நாயகியாய் ஆதிக்கம் தான்செய்யும்;

மஞ்சளின், மல்லியின் வாசத்தை வாங்கிவரும்;

ஈவெரார் வாக்கில்வரும், குணத்தினால் அகம்காக்கும்; 

பல்வேறார் கண்ணீரின் பொருளாகும் - என்றும்  

பெண்ணுக்கு வெங்காயம் நேர்!


#நவீன_காளமேகம் #சிலேடை


#ஆனந்தக்கவிராயர் 


Birds of a feather Flop Together

Annotated quotes on Thought Diversity




A well-known study by Thomas Malone of MIT’s Sloan School of Business examined the secrets of collective intelligence - what makes a group of people intelligent?


You should search the web for the full study, but here’s the gist: The group’s intelligence was not the aggregate or average IQ of the group members. One major contributing factor for a group’s intelligence is the proportion of active participants. If for whatever reason, a small part of the group dominated the conversation, it affected the group intelligence adversely. My interpretation was that this was a symptom of two things - the vocal part of the group lacked the empathy for the sentiments of the silent segment. And the silence  of a part of the group affected the thought diversity.


I’ve wondered if that’s not the same case for individuals. Is a person's intelligence influenced by their similarity to their friends? I believe so.


In general, our mind expands by considering contradictions. By lacking exposure to opposing points of view, or refusing to consider contradicting thoughts, we risk pushing ourselves into extreme positions without being aware. When we surround ourselves with like-minded people, we cut out the input from the rest of the population. Content suggestions on social media platforms exacerbate the problem. They suggest what they think we may want to read, things that are already aligned with our beliefs.


When we’re insensate to how homogenous our world has become, our view misses several vital dimensions that allow us to see things for what they are.


"When you realize how susceptible you are to others’ emotions, you become more thoughtful about who you surround yourself with. Who you follow on Twitter, who you watch on TV, where you work, who you hang out with after work. Who you marry – that’s a huge one. The higher the stakes, the more thoughtful you need to be about those who surround you."


- Morgan Housel, in this article 

Dimensions In Reality


Most real view issues have hundreds of dimensions. When I read a piece of news, I view it through my economic, religious, social, academic and moral points of view. Even if I change the point of view on one of these dimensions, I may view the news piece entirely differently. Real word demands that we traverse a few of these dimensions before forming an opinion.


For example, you shouldn’t support the position of a leader or political party on one issue just because your views are aligned on another.


“If your opinions on one topic can be predicted from your opinions on another, you may be in the grip of an ideology. When you truly think for yourself, your opinions won’t be predictable.”


- Kevin Kelly.

Scales of Grey


I’ve made a rule for myself about important events with polarized points of view. I call it five shades of grey. When I want to think clearly about a polarizing event, I try to write at least 5 grades of support for the issue from one extreme to another, starting from ‘fully disagree’ to ‘fully agree’, for example. It enables me to plot myself along the continuum, and also helps me identify why some might have extreme points of view.


Think of a polarizing issue when you read the following: Most people tend to think of themselves to be fairly moderate, close to the centre, but rate most people they disagree with to be extreme on the other side. I try to explicitly describe (preferably in writing)  five or more shades of grey for an issue. It encourages more nuanced thinking, and helps be sensitive to the differences among the people among those I disagree with.


For example, a recent hot button issue in India was the consecration of the deity in the Rama Temple in Ayodhya. The following are six grades of grey in the support spectrum:

  • This should show the Muslims. It’s a Hindu country!
  • A much needed civilizational correction. No need for the Muslims to be resentful.
  • The temple is ok, but I wish they hadn’t built it after destroying the mosque.
  • Why is all this necessary now? Could we not have waited for greater buy in?
  • I don’t need such overt symbols. Rama is in my heart.
  • Everyone building the temple and supporting the movement are bigots. I hate them!

This example was inspired by a post by Ramana Balachandran, the Carnatic music artiste. See the following link where he politely chastises a fellow artiste for characterizing all the people in disagreement as being in the extreme camp.


https://twitter.com/_RamanaB_/status/1750921991048003801


And it’s ok not to have an opinion even on polarizing issues. Ignore folks who say, ‘if you are not with us, you’re one of them!’


"It’s possible to not have an opinion….  You don’t have to turn this (lack of an opinion)  into something, ... You don’t have to let this upset you. You don’t have to think something about everything. "


-  Marcus Aurelius.

Talking to the “Enemy”


"So much of what people call 'conviction' is actually a willful disregard of facts that might change their mind."


- Morgan Housel


In this age of polarized social media cacophony, a valuable skill is to be able to talk to people with opposing points of view, and really listen, without being upset. In addition to learning if the opponents have valid points, you also learn their arguments in depth.


“I never allow myself to hold an opinion on anything that I don't know the other side's argument better than they do”


- Charlie Munger

If the conversation really goes well, there is a small chance that one of you might convince the other. How can that be a bad thing?

"It’s the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it. "


- Aristotle.

Changing one’s mind - the intelligent person’s prerogative

History is full of examples of great people changing their minds. Albert Einstein was a self-avowed pacifist. He abhorred people killing each other. He laid the theoretical foundation for the nuclear bomb with his theory on mass-energy equivalence. He initially believed that the idea was solely theoretical, and that it was impractical for someone to actually use the theory to build an energy source, including one for use as a weapon. 

On hearing credible reports that the Germans were building a nuclear bomb, he changed his mind, and wrote to President Roosevelt in 1933, advocating an American program with similar goals.

After the allies won the war, it was found that the German program had never been close to producing a bomb, while the Americans actually used the bomb to horrific effect in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Einstein changed his mind again. He was full of remorse for his role in advocating for a nuclear bomb, despite having played no hands-on role.

“I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong.”


- Bertrand Russell


This does not mean that Einstein was of a fickle mind. Far from it. He had demonstrated superhuman resolve in all his initiatives. It was just that he allowed himself to be influenced by the likelihood of the Nazis building a nuclear bomb, given what was at stake.


“The problem with this world is that fools and fanatics are always so sure of themselves, and the wiser people, so full of doubts.”


- Bertrand Russell



Related Content:


Pic credit: Wikipedia.

Slumdog Programmer



For those who haven’t watched the movie ‘Slumdog Millionaire’, here is a summary: There is this kid who answers all the questions on the Indian edition of ‘Who wants to be a millionaire’. Some think he's cheating. As the story unfolds, you realize that he really has experienced the events the questions are based on. The movie was based on a novel ‘Q&A’.

The movie came to mind when I was talking to my children about the my education and work.

I recall my early days as an alumnus of the National Institute of Technology, Trichy in India. (Then called Regional Engineering College, Trichy). I had just graduated and found a job.
I used to attend the alumni association meetings regularly. A regular feature of such meetings was a discussion on the contents of the program I'd just graduated from. The confidence that came from having a good job, and a first-hand knowledge of the work environment made me and my peers believe that we were well positioned to offer feedback to the university on the course contents.

The program I graduated from was a combination of computer science and mathematics, with some management courses thrown in. It was a much sought after program. I recall the elation when I was offered admission, the sense of awe that came with it, the fear and the resultant humility. (“Gee! This is all so sophisticated! Am I going to be a misfit?’).

In hindsight, this makes it all the more surprising that I felt qualified to offer advice on the course contents right after graduation.

I participated in several meetings where we debated the useful and dispensable parts of the course. In those days, most people did database work, so there was a vocal part of the group that felt that databases, SQL, form designers and report generators were all that were needed. ‘Who needs compilers, data structures, numerical analysis, statistics and all that stuff? And why are they shoving courses on organizational behavior and economics down our throats?’.

I don’t recall how far I supported such positions. I might have been ambivalent in response to such sentiments. But I was certainly party to the group recommendations. Our recommendation, as I recall, was to lighten the students' workload by dropping a few courses.

Fast forward three decades, and I’m glad that they made us learn all that. What I was forced to learn during my student days has helped me solve several hard problems over the years. At the very least, the background knowledge ensured that I didn’t back down from many challenges.

When I got my first job in England, I joined an international software development team. I was initially not very comfortable in the team. The team was mostly contractors from various European countries. Some seemed to view me, the new arrival, with suspicion.

The team worked on a software product. All the low-level functionality of the software was exposed to the application tier through an interpreted scripting language. The language might have been well-designed and tidy to begin with, but had evolved to a beast over acquisitions and team changes. Any new functionality involved enhancing the scripting language. There was no oversight, or coherent guidance for how to do those enhancements. So, people threw new statements and phrases in the language, as long as the changes didn’t break anything else, all was considered to be good. As a newcomer, I didn’t spot the problem immediately, but noticed that every time I compiled the code, yacc, the parser generator warned of several conflicts. The folk wisdom went like, ‘as long as you don’t see more than 27 shift/reduce conflicts and 9 reduce/reduce conflicts, you’re ok’. 

I was working over a christmas break, mainly because I had exhausted my vacation days for the year. I didn’t have much to do, so I chased one of those warnings. I had studied compilers and formal languages in my course without any idea why. But strangely, that background had given me some intuition on why expressing a scripting phrase one way was ok, but not another way. Without being able to explain my changes, I did a few experimental changes, and found that I could get rid of half the conflicts with a day’s work. I checked my changes in, ensured that the overnight build went ok, and went home after sending a request for code review.

The effect on the rest of the team was sensational! My boss was especially impressed that the new guy had somehow acquired a mysterious skill that was missing in the team. He wanted to make me the gatekeeper for the scripting language, but thankfully didn’t insist when I declined. The rest of the team seemed to have the attitude, ‘Better you than me!’ as everyone hated the interpreter part of the code. So everyone was happy. That incident went a long way in me being accepted as a member of the team.

That was one episode. Over the years, I had found a use for graph theory when I was working on routing software. (Yes, the thing that Google maps routing does!). I’d found a use for numerical analysis when I was asked to implement coordinate transformations to transform geometric objects on spherical/ellipsoidal earth to a flat map or screen. Linear algebra, matrix multiplications, differential calculus, and mathematical functions came in handy when I learned machine learning.  When I write algorithms, having an intuition on algorithmic complexity helps. These were all taught to me in another part of the world in another era! 

Turns out that the management courses were useful as well. I can follow statements about EBITDA and P&L when the product managers talk about the quarter.  The organizational studies gave me the vocabulary to translate top mangement's statements to my team in their language.

I don’t want to give you the impression that I was somehow a model student, or that I understood everything that was taught. Far from it. I started with all the ideals, but had subsequently settled for keeping my head above water as new information was taught, and studied just enough to pass the courses. Not all the teachers were good, or even fully competent. But overall, the course content and instruction have worked out pretty well in my case. What seemed like a hodgepodge of disconnected learnings helped me prepare for my career.

Or perhaps I was just lucky like that kid in ‘Slumdog Millionaire’.

To generalize this a bit, post-secondary education prepares you for your entire career, not just for the first job after graduation. It prepares you to learn, unlearn, relearn and connect seemingly disparate subjects to address problems in complex, real world scearios. My recommendation to my children is not to view their courses with a minimalist 'what-good-is-this-going-to-do' bias.

Too much of specialization early in career can reduce the range of problems you can address later in your career. On that note, David Epstein advocates for a wide range in skills; and argues that there is a whole set of problems waiting to be solved by 'generalists', who can combine two or more disciplines. See here for a summary of his book "Range: Why Generalists Trimph in a Specialized World".

Featured Post

Parthiban Kanavu - the Unabridged English Translation

My translation of Kalki's Parthiban Kanavu is posted as a separate blog.   Here are a few easy links for you to start with. Table of Con...